|
News Feed
|
LinuxHPC.org.org has an RSS/RDF feed if you wish to include it on your website.
|
 |
 |
Linux Cluster RFQ Form
Reach Multiple Vendors With One Linux Cluster RFQ Form. Save time and effort, let LinuxHPC.org do all the leg work for you free of charge. Request A Quote...
|
|

|
LinuxHPC.org is Looking for Interns - If you have experience with Linux clusters and/or cluster applications and you're interested in helping out with LinuxHPC.org let me know. I can promise the experience will be rewarding and educational, plus it'll make good resume fodder. You'll work with vendors and cluster users from around the world. We're also looking for writers and people to do hardware/software reviews. Contact Ken Farmer.
|
|


Opteron vs. Nocona: It's the system, stupid
|
|
Tuesday August 31 2004 @ 07:34AM EDT
|
|
InfoWorld: If you think AMD’s Opteron and Intel’s Nocona -- or more formally, “Xeon Processor with 800MHz System Bus” -- are cut from the same 64-bit cloth, look closer. Yes, they’re compatible at the instruction-set and register levels; they should be because they’re both based on AMD’s x86-64 specification. But the total system architecture surrounding these chips -- which includes pathways to other CPUs, memory, and peripherals -- exhibits several differences that factor into buying decisions and developers’ platform targeting.
At its core, Nocona is a NetBurst Xeon DP, a Pentium 4 equipped for dual-processor operation. It has 1MB of Level 2 cache and a top clock speed of 3.6GHz. All memory and I/O data, interrupts, interprocessor communication, and address requests flow over a fast shared bus with a maximum bandwidth of 6.4GBps. It’s a highly evolved design, on the leading edge while remaining faithful to the legacy design principles that Intel is expected to maintain.
Full story...
|
|
|
 |
 |